tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36840761.post3809872827730596102..comments2014-06-27T17:40:15.136-07:00Comments on RedRain: These are the exact arguments made before the Ohio Supreme Court by my highly regarded retained defense counsel in 2006 in defense of my handling of the Accola clients' bankruptcy case that would be eventually held against me by the lopsided and heavily weighted nearly all-Republican Ohio High Court, which they used in suspending my legal career as an active lawyer at that time. [Note: There are errors in the way this official record was herein transcribed by the referened reporting service noted on these pages. The various mistakes are found in the original here on google and are not resulting from my own reproduction of this otherwise, alleged official record. (For instance, "aired" is often inccorrectly used in this transcript for what was obviously meant by the lawyers as "error" "ESPN is used in the transcript, for the word "suspension". Etc., etc.. This is itself odd and demonstrates a level of clear incompetence by the transciption service. However, while i'm not sure what professional agency reproduced this doc, otherwise, I have found it in the main, contains for the first time since that hearing, in 06, a decent representation for the sake of the literal real argument, and the only ever published recorded and reproduced record of such arguments to be found anywhere that contains my counsels official arguments in total, made by these two highly regarded, serious and very careful and highly experienced lawyers from the Kravitz law firm, including the late, Max Kravitz himself and his noted, close, top law partner, Ms. Paula Brown who wrote and gave the oral argument on my behalf.}Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36840761.post-31617208215381414362014-06-27T17:40:15.136-07:002014-06-27T17:40:15.136-07:00Noting...
also, the next rebuttal part of my c...Noting...<br /><br /> also, the next rebuttal part of my counsel's final arugments are to be included below<br /><br /> {for the record, the Acola's were the clients, for which I did a 65 page bankruptcy and completed it after a very difficult client-attorney relationship wherein they did not comply with my requests for in person conferences, nor bring me there adequate records and in the final months of this representation completely failed to pay me, what they had agreed to pay upon completion of the petition which again, was done with careful exacting and dedicated assistance between both myself, my paralegal on the bankruptcy and several secretaries who all testified in my defense about the extreme complex relationship and dealings both I and my office staff had with these two bankrupts, ...later, much later, a year after this had been litigated, I discovered in fact, these individuals had been involved in multiple scams against elderly citizens in Youngstown and the male Acola had a serious criminal felony record for fraud and inducing fraud surrounding his home improvement business and again had been convicted twice for such actions in his hometown. Sadly, the Ohio Supreme Court believed this twice convicted felons and frauds over my five witnesses and secretaries and my own personal representations, indicating that, I not them, was guilty of "many misrepresentations" as the protagonist "ethics" prosecutor from YOungstown Ohio's Bar Association tried and successfully was able to make the Ohio Supreme Court 'buy' into these peoples representations and the bar's arguments over against my highly regarded and well stated defense counsel and our many pages of testimony in support of the same.<br /><br /> Here in below, is the rest of my counsel's arguments in closing before the Supreme Court.<br /><br /><br />The Court:<br /><br />he has been practicing law for how many years? <br /><br />>> '89. <br /><br />>> Slipsky: "about 10 years." <br /><br />>> since 1989. <br /><br />>> Court: That is 17 years. And he has only had this complaint? <br /><br />>> Slipsky: "I cannot confirm or deny." <br /><br />>> a formal complaint. You can answer that. <br /><br />>> correct. <br /><br />>> okay. <br /><br />>> Slipsky: "none that has been certified by the board of commissioners"<br /><br /><br />the rebuttal and final arguments of Paula Brown in my Defense, before the Court, will be posted <br />in a separate blog postrichard olivitohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01369237277582868832noreply@blogger.com